[PATCH] ia64: use __ratelimit

From: Akinobu Mita
Date: Sun Feb 28 2010 - 05:59:16 EST


Replace open-coded rate limiting logic with __ratelimit().

Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c | 9 +++------
arch/ia64/kernel/unaligned.c | 24 +++++-------------------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c
index d4093a1..d5150d0 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#include <linux/threads.h>
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/ratelimit.h>

#include <asm/delay.h>
#include <asm/intrinsics.h>
@@ -468,13 +469,9 @@ ia64_handle_irq (ia64_vector vector, struct pt_regs *regs)
sp = ia64_getreg(_IA64_REG_SP);

if ((sp - bsp) < 1024) {
- static unsigned char count;
- static long last_time;
+ static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(ratelimit, 5 * HZ, 5);

- if (time_after(jiffies, last_time + 5 * HZ))
- count = 0;
- if (++count < 5) {
- last_time = jiffies;
+ if (__ratelimit(&ratelimit)) {
printk("ia64_handle_irq: DANGER: less than "
"1KB of free stack space!!\n"
"(bsp=0x%lx, sp=%lx)\n", bsp, sp);
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/unaligned.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/unaligned.c
index 776dd40..622772b 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/unaligned.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/unaligned.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/tty.h>
+#include <linux/ratelimit.h>

#include <asm/intrinsics.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
@@ -1283,24 +1284,9 @@ emulate_store_float (unsigned long ifa, load_store_t ld, struct pt_regs *regs)
/*
* Make sure we log the unaligned access, so that user/sysadmin can notice it and
* eventually fix the program. However, we don't want to do that for every access so we
- * pace it with jiffies. This isn't really MP-safe, but it doesn't really have to be
- * either...
+ * pace it with jiffies.
*/
-static int
-within_logging_rate_limit (void)
-{
- static unsigned long count, last_time;
-
- if (time_after(jiffies, last_time + 5 * HZ))
- count = 0;
- if (count < 5) {
- last_time = jiffies;
- count++;
- return 1;
- }
- return 0;
-
-}
+static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(logging_rate_limit, 5 * HZ, 5);

void
ia64_handle_unaligned (unsigned long ifa, struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -1337,7 +1323,7 @@ ia64_handle_unaligned (unsigned long ifa, struct pt_regs *regs)

if (!no_unaligned_warning &&
!(current->thread.flags & IA64_THREAD_UAC_NOPRINT) &&
- within_logging_rate_limit())
+ __ratelimit(&logging_rate_limit))
{
char buf[200]; /* comm[] is at most 16 bytes... */
size_t len;
@@ -1370,7 +1356,7 @@ ia64_handle_unaligned (unsigned long ifa, struct pt_regs *regs)
}
}
} else {
- if (within_logging_rate_limit()) {
+ if (__ratelimit(&logging_rate_limit)) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "kernel unaligned access to 0x%016lx, ip=0x%016lx\n",
ifa, regs->cr_iip + ipsr->ri);
if (unaligned_dump_stack)
--
1.6.0.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/