Re: EXT4 is ~2X as slow as XFS (593MB/s vs 304MB/s) for writes?
From: Justin Piszcz
Date: Mon Mar 01 2010 - 04:21:13 EST
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On 2010-02-28, at 07:55, Justin Piszcz wrote:
=== CREATE RAID-0 WITH 11 DISKS
Have you tried testing with "nice" numbers of disks in your RAID set (e.g. 8
disks for RAID-0, 9 for RAID-5, 10 for RAID-6)? The mballoc code is really
much better tuned for power-of-two sized allocations.
Yes, the second system (RAID-5) has 8 disks and it shows the same
performance problems with ext4 and not XFS (as shown from previous
e-mail), where XFS usually got 500-600MiB/s for writes.
For the RAID-5 (from earlier testing): <- This one has 8 disks.
10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 48.7335 s, 220 MB/s
10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 30.5425 s, 352 MB/s
An increase of 132MiB/s.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/