Re: [PATCH] udf: use ext2_find_next_bit

From: Jan Kara
Date: Mon Mar 01 2010 - 05:52:01 EST

On Thu 25-02-10 10:38:25, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2010/2/25 Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>:
> > On Tue 23-02-10 23:11:13, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> >> Use ext2_find_next_bit (generic_find_next_le_bit) to find the set bit
> >> in little endian bitmap region.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> >  I've looked at the code and I think this is wrong. UDF uses 1 for free
> > block in the bitmap and 0 for used one. So you need to use
> > generic_find_next_le_bit...
> >  Something like the patch below?
> According to include/asm-generic/bitops/ext2-non-atomic.h,
> generic_find_next_le_bit() == ext2_find_next_bit().
Ah, I'm really sorry. I've originally misread the header and thought that
ext2_find_next_bit == generic_find_next_le_zero_bit. So my patch does
exactly the same thing as yours. I've now merged your patch so that you get
proper credit.

> BTW, I realized that udf_find_first_one_bit() macro is not used.
> So you can remove it in this patch.
Yes, I've removed it now.


Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at