Re: use of setjmp/longjmp in x86 emulator.

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 03/01/2010 11:18 AM, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> 
> It's going to be ugly to emulate segmentation, NX and write protect 
> support without hardware to do this checking for you, but it's just what 
> you have to do in this slow path - tedious, fully specified emulation.
> 
> Just because it's tedious doesn't mean we need to use setjmp / longjmp.  
> Throw / catch might be effective, but it's still pretty bizarre to do 
> tricks like that in C.
> 

Well, setjmp/longjmp really is not much more than exception handling in C.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/