Re: [PATCH] ufs: make solaris fsck happy

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:47:43 +0300
Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> --- a/fs/ufs/ufs_fs.h
> +++ b/fs/ufs/ufs_fs.h
> @@ -227,11 +227,16 @@ typedef __u16 __bitwise __fs16;
>   */
>  #define ufs_cbtocylno(bno) \
>  	((bno) * uspi->s_nspf / uspi->s_spc)
> -#define ufs_cbtorpos(bno) \
> +#define ufs_cbtorpos(bno)				      \
> +	((UFS_SB(sb)->s_flags & UFS_CG_SUN) ?		      \
> +	 (((((bno) * uspi->s_nspf % uspi->s_spc) %	      \
> +	    uspi->s_nsect) *				      \
> +	   uspi->s_nrpos) / uspi->s_nsect)		      \
> +	 :						      \
>  	((((bno) * uspi->s_nspf % uspi->s_spc / uspi->s_nsect \
>  	* uspi->s_trackskew + (bno) * uspi->s_nspf % uspi->s_spc \
>  	% uspi->s_nsect * uspi->s_interleave) % uspi->s_nsect \
> -	* uspi->s_nrpos) / uspi->s_npsect)
> +	  * uspi->s_nrpos) / uspi->s_npsect))

yikes, that macro should be killed with a stick before it becomes
self-aware and starts breeding.

Or converted into a C function which humans have a chance of
understanding and maintaining.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/