Re: [PATCH -mmotm 3/3] memcg: dirty pages instrumentation
From: Andrea Righi
Date: Tue Mar 02 2010 - 03:02:12 EST
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:23:09AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 22:23:40 +0100
> Andrea Righi <arighi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Apply the cgroup dirty pages accounting and limiting infrastructure to
> > the opportune kernel functions.
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Seems nice.
> Hmm. the last problem is moving account between memcg.
> Right ?
Correct. This was actually the last item of the TODO list. Anyway, I'm
still considering if it's correct to move dirty pages when a task is
migrated from a cgroup to another. Currently, dirty pages just remain in
the original cgroup and are flushed depending on the original cgroup
settings. That is not totally wrong... at least moving the dirty pages
between memcgs should be optional (move_charge_at_immigrate?).
Thanks for your ack and the detailed review!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/