Re: [tip:perf/core] perf_events, x86: Fixup fixed counter constraints

[Stephane Eranian]

On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 17:26 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> > @@ -37,14 +43,16 @@ static struct event_constraint intel_core2_event_constraints[] =
>> > Â Â Â ÂINTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x18, 0x1), /* IDLE_DURING_DIV */
>> > Â Â Â ÂINTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x19, 0x2), /* DELAYED_BYPASS */
>> > Â Â Â ÂINTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xa1, 0x1), /* RS_UOPS_DISPATCH_CYCLES */
>> > + Â Â Â INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xc9, 0x1), /* ITLB_MISS_RETIRED (T30-9) */
>>
>> Where does the constraint on ITLB_MISS_RETIRED come from?
>
> Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developerâs Manual
> Volume 3B: System Programming Guide, Part 2
>
> Dec 2009 (253669)
>
> Section 30.4.3, Table 30-9
>
I am not so sure about this one. I will double check.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/