Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] perf: Take a hot regs snapshot for traceevents

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 07:55 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> +/*
>   * Output
>   */
>  static bool perf_output_space(struct perf_mmap_data *data, unsigned long tail,
> @@ -4337,6 +4347,8 @@ static const struct pmu perf_ops_task_clock = {
>  void perf_tp_event(int event_id, u64 addr, u64 count, void *record,
>  			  int entry_size)
>  {
> +	struct pt_regs regs;
> +
>  	struct perf_raw_record raw = {
>  		.size = entry_size,
>  		.data = record,
> @@ -4347,14 +4359,11 @@ void perf_tp_event(int event_id, u64 addr, u64 count, void *record,
>  		.raw = &raw,
>  	};
>  
> -	struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
> -
> -	if (!regs)
> -		regs = task_pt_regs(current);
> +	PERF_SAVE_REGS(&regs);
>  
>  	/* Trace events already protected against recursion */
>  	do_perf_sw_event(PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, event_id, count, 1,
> -				&data, regs);
> +				&data, &regs);

Off-topic: Why is the above a perf sw event? Couldn't that also be a
normal TRACE_EVENT()?

-- Steve

>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_tp_event);
>  


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/