Re: O_NONBLOCK is NOOP on block devices
From: Jeff Moyer
Date: Fri Mar 05 2010 - 11:03:45 EST
M vd S <mvds.00@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > > If O_NONBLOCK is meaningful whatsoever (see man page docs for
>> > > semantics) against block devices, one would expect a nonblocking io
>> > It isn't...
>> Thanks for the reply. It's good to get confirmation that I am not all
>> alone in an alternate non blocking universe. The linux man pages
>> actually had me convinced O_NONBLOCK would actually keep a process
>> from blocking on device io :-)
> You're even less alone, I'm running into the same issue just now. But
> I think I've found a way around it, see below.
I guess I should note that I've suggested nonblocking I/O for files
I'll also note that enabling such a patch broke apps that accessed cd
burners, for example, since O_NONBLOCK had some preexisting semantics
there that I fail to recall.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/