Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: Introduce new perf_save_regs() for hot regssnapshot
From: Masami Hiramatsu
Date: Fri Mar 05 2010 - 12:08:49 EST
Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 10:08:07AM -0500, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>> +void perf_arch_save_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long ip, int skip)
>> Hmm, why would you call it 'save_regs' ?
>> It seems that this function is just for fixing registers
>> instead of saving it into somewhere...
>> Thank you,
> Hmm, save_regs() describes what it does: you pass
> a pt_regs and it saves registers inside. But it
> has also a kind of fixup thing as it also rewinds.
Ah, I see. so this saves current register values
into pt_regs. :)
> I'm not sure using a fixup thing for the naming
> is correct as we are not starting with initial
> regs passed to the function (just a raw buffer).
> What about perf_save_caller_regs() ?
Hmm, I think, it might be better perf_get_caller_regs()
or something like that (fetch ?).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/