Re: [patch 2/2] x86: Manage ENERGY_PERF_BIAS based on cpufreqgovernor
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Fri Mar 05 2010 - 16:13:42 EST
On Fri 2010-03-05 20:55:22, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:40:29PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > That can be only true if it does not give benefits period... AC and
> > battery power are quite different scenarios.
> No, they're not.
Yes, they are.
Would you care to elaborate? I may very well want top power on AC
power, and max powersavings on battery; most people do.
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/