Re: [git pull] drm request 3
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Sat Mar 06 2010 - 12:42:54 EST
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> You shouldn't expect, by now, upgrade drm kernel without update libdrm
> or at least recompile libdrm.
Why shouldn't I expect that? I already outlined exactly _how_ it could be
Why are people saying that technology has to suck?
> So when you saw a error message "driver nouveau 0.0.n+1 and have 0.0.n"
> is completely right.
No. It's _not_ right. The code knows what is wrong. Considering it a fatal
error is _stupid_ and bad technology, when it could have just fixed it.
> Is not a perfect world, but as talked on xorg mailing list, some time
> ago, we do not have resources to test it in all versions.
> Is better focus on just one combination.
This is not about "testing all versions". It's fine to have just one
combination. But why the hell doesn't it _load_ that one combination
instead of just dying?
IOW, there is a check for a version. It could - instead of dying - just
dlopen() the right version instead.
Why are people making excuses for bad programming and bad technology?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/