Re: modules, "modules" and CONFIG_LIST_SORT

[Linus Torvalds]

On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> 
> Unpleasant side effect of the change is that some modules stop being
> true modules, i. e. admin is unable to start using them without reboot
> if kernel was compiled without that tiny amount of core kernel.
> 
> Having used this feature several times, I think it'd be correct
> to preserve this behaviour, at least not regress for those modules
> which benefitted from it. For modules which were always "modules" (ipv6)
> it's fine to continue.
> 
> Can we declare some policy about it?
> 
> And revert LIST_SORT commit if yes.

Yeah, I think that in cases like this, you have a very good argument: 
LIST_SORT enables code that isn't that large, and is clearly very generic.

And changing the config later and trying to compile and install a module 
is rather sane. And if that new module needs LIST_SORT, you're screwed 
because it didn't get compiled in originally.

Honestly, personally I'd rather have a real library that modules can link 
to _before_ even loading into kernel space, but that's not how we've 
traditionally done things. So I guess we should just revert that commit.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/