Re: [PATCH 0/26] oprofile: Performance counter multiplexing
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Sun Mar 07 2010 - 22:51:52 EST
> the tests I run with oprofile do not indicate unreliable ring_buffer
Did you try it with callgraph mode? That seems to be worst.
> behavior. Maybe my use cases and loads are different. Can you describe
> a setup where this may happen for sure? What is the impact, do you
Seeing it on very busy 16 CPU and larger systems.
> have lost samples or inconsistent buffer data? Is the data loss in
There are a lot of lost samples, callgraphs are incomplete etc.
> kernel or user space? Also, I am not aware that the ring_buffer is
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/