Re: [PATCH 06/20] early_res: seperate common memmap func from e820.cto fw_memmap.c

[Ingo Molnar]

* Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 10:28 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > Note the other side of the coin: LMB appears to be deployed on only 4 
> > non-x86 architectures that muster ~1% of the Linux boxes while early_res 
> > is deployed on more than 95%.
> 
> You use that arguemnt ONE MORE FUCKING TIME and you'll end up in my killfile 
> with a auto-NACK reply of anything that looks like a patch from you.

Does this mean you disagree with that? (I think it's pretty factual, last i 
checked the usage stats of devel kernels was somewhere around 99.7%.)

In any case, i dont dispute that LMB is a bit cleaner than kernel/early_res.c 
- and both are much cleaner than the new e820 kernel/fw_memmap.c code posted 
here by Yinghai.

If you dont disagree then please spare me the insults. (or move me into your 
killfile)

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/