RE: [PATCH] bfa: wrong fcport H2I message tested in bfa_fcport_isr()

[Jing Huang]

This is not intended. Using penable_rsp or pdisable_rsp in this case doesn't have functional difference since it is a union, but it is confusing and should be fixed.

Thanks

Jing

-----Original Message-----
From: Roel Kluin [mailto:roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 1:49 PM
To: Jing Huang; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Andrew Morton; LKML
Subject: [PATCH] bfa: wrong fcport H2I message tested in bfa_fcport_isr()

It appears that the wrong fcport H2I message was tested

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Was this intended?

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcport.c b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcport.c
index c589488..5e5e6fe 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcport.c
@@ -1281,7 +1281,7 @@ bfa_fcport_isr(struct bfa_s *bfa, struct bfi_msg_s *msg)
 		break;
 
 	case BFI_FCPORT_I2H_DISABLE_RSP:
-		if (fcport->msgtag == i2hmsg.penable_rsp->msgtag)
+		if (fcport->msgtag == i2hmsg.pdisable_rsp->msgtag)
 			bfa_sm_send_event(fcport, BFA_FCPORT_SM_FWRSP);
 		break;
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/