Re: [RFC Patch 2/3] bridge: make bridge support netpoll

[Matt Mackall]

On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:03 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 04:17 -0400, Amerigo Wang wrote:
> >> Based on the previous patch, make bridge support netpoll by:
> >>
> >> 1) implement the 4 methods to support netpoll for bridge;
> >>
> >> 2) modify netpoll during forwarding packets in bridge;
> >>
> >> 3) disable netpoll support of bridge when a netpoll-unabled device
> >>    is added to bridge;
> > 
> > Not sure if this is the right thing to do. Shouldn't we simply enable
> > polling on all devices that support it and warn about the others (aka
> > best effort)?
> > 
> 
> I don't think it's a good idea, because we check if a device
> supports netpoll by checking if it has ndo_poll_controller method.

Uh, what? If we have 5 devices on a bridge and 4 support netpoll, then
shouldn't we just send netconsole messages to those 4 devices? Isn't
this much better than simply refusing to work?

-- 
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/