Re: [PATCH 06/20] early_res: seperate common memmap func frome820.c to fw_memmap.c

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 12:16 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> So if you want your architecture to matter to me the rule is very simple: 
> contribute, contribute, contribute, and stop whining. If you dont contribute, 
> frankly you dont really exist to me. On the other hand if you are actively 
> contributing while your architecture only exists on paper, it already starts 
> mattering to me.
> 
> I'm really that simple.

So basically, what you are saying is that, totally regardless of how
much an architecture is actually used in the field, if the architecture
maintainer for it doesn't also do your work and contribute to every
single of your pet projects, or if everybody is like you, every single
other subsystem in the kernel, then that architecture is irrelevant for
technical considerations and choices regarding any design decision made
to the core kernel ?

Sorry Ingo, but that's just arrogant bullshit. So stop trying to win
this useless argument, all you manage to do is anger people and make us
even less willing to actually work with you.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/