Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: pcmcia: fix checkpatch.pl issues in soc_common.c

From: Sergei Shtylyov
Date: Thu Mar 25 2010 - 06:20:10 EST


Hello.

Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

- debug(skt, 2, "mask: %s%s%s%s%s%sflags: %s%s%s%s%s%sVcc %d Vpp %d irq %d\n",
- (state->csc_mask==0)?"<NONE> ":"",
- (state->csc_mask&SS_DETECT)?"DETECT ":"",
- (state->csc_mask&SS_READY)?"READY ":"",
- (state->csc_mask&SS_BATDEAD)?"BATDEAD ":"",
- (state->csc_mask&SS_BATWARN)?"BATWARN ":"",
- (state->csc_mask&SS_STSCHG)?"STSCHG ":"",
- (state->flags==0)?"<NONE> ":"",
- (state->flags&SS_PWR_AUTO)?"PWR_AUTO ":"",
- (state->flags&SS_IOCARD)?"IOCARD ":"",
- (state->flags&SS_RESET)?"RESET ":"",
- (state->flags&SS_SPKR_ENA)?"SPKR_ENA ":"",
- (state->flags&SS_OUTPUT_ENA)?"OUTPUT_ENA ":"",
+ debug(skt, 2, "mask: %s%s%s%s%s%s "
+ "flags: %s%s%s%s%s%s Vcc %d Vpp %d irq %d\n",

NAK. Breaking kernel messages across multiple lines makes them impossible
to grep for. checkpatch.pl is wrong on this one.

I'd disagree in this case. Anybody will hardly grep for "mask: %s%s%s%s%s%sflags: %s%s%s%s%s%s".

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/