Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] cpuset,mm: update task's mems_allowed lazily

From: Miao Xie
Date: Thu Mar 25 2010 - 08:56:22 EST


on 2010-3-25 18:23, Miao Xie wrote:
> on 2010-3-11 19:03, Nick Piggin wrote:
>> Well... I do think seqlocks would be a bit simpler because they don't
>> require this checking and synchronizing of this patch.
>
> Hi, Nick Piggin
>
> I have made a new patch which uses seqlock to protect mems_allowed and mempolicy.
> please review it.
>
> title: [PATCH -mmotm] cpuset,mm: use seqlock to protect task->mempolicy and mems_allowed
>

Sorry! Please ignore this patch, because I sent an old version. I'll send the new one later.

Regards!
Miao

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/