Re: [RFC patch] extable and module add object is static

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Peter Zijlstra (peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 09:39 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > +static int core_object_is_static(void *obj)
> > > +{
> > [...]
> > > +	if (addr >= (unsigned long)__per_cpu_start &&
> > > +	    addr <= (unsigned long)__per_cpu_end)
> > > +		return 1;
> > 
> > This may only correct for UP.
> > You may need arch-special codes for SMP.
> > 
> 
> Tejun has patches for this.
> 

That's great! Tejun, can you point me out to an update version of these
patches ? I am particularly interested in being able to know the range of
statically defined per-cpu data.

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/