Re: [stable] nfsd changes for 2.6.34

From: Greg KH
Date: Tue Mar 30 2010 - 16:32:28 EST


On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:40:54AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:24:43AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:24:14AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 12:52:12PM -0500, bfields wrote:
> > > > Please pull the following nfsd changes from the 'nfsd' branch at:
> > > >
> > > > git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git for-2.6.34 nfsd
> > > >
> > > > This is an unusually quiet cycle for the NFS server--bugfixes, some IPv6
> > > > progress, and one new export operation to improve sync performance.
> > > >
> > > > One exception to the 'mostly quiet' statement was a regression in the
> > > > rpc code which hit a lot of people: enormous thanks to Neil for tracking
> > > > that down.
> > >
> > > However, I forgot to Cc stable on all of those. Stable people, could
> > > you also take the following three commits?:
> > >
> > > f5822754ea006563e1bf0a1f43faaad49c0d8bb2 Revert "sunrpc: fix
> > > peername failed on closed listener"
> > > 1b644b6e6f6160ae35ce4b52c2ca89ed3e356e18 Revert "sunrpc: move
> > > the close processing after do recvfrom method"
> > > 301e99ce4a2f42a317129230fd42e6cd874c64b0 nfsd: ensure sockets
> > > are closed on error
> > >
> > > Let me know if you need more information.
> >
> > I've queued all of these up for the .33 -stable tree. If any of them
> > need to go into .32 (maybe that last one?), please let me know.
>
> Thanks; .32 needs all three of those.

Ok, care to backport them and send them to stable@xxxxxxxxxx? They
don't all apply cleanly from what I can see.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/