Re: [PATCH] audit: Reactive rules

[Al Viro]

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:17:11AM +0200, Juraj Hlista wrote:
> From: Juraj Hlista <juro.hlista@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add support for reactive rules. An audit rule can contain more than one reaction. The reactions are identified by numbers in the kernel and by strings in the user space.

Huh?  We already have a way to associate a unique key with a rule; what does
that patch offer that can't be happily handled by userland with what we
already have?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/