Re: start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early

From: David Howells
Date: Wed Mar 31 2010 - 19:00:34 EST

Next message: Stephen Hemminger: "Re: [Patch] bonding: fix potential deadlock in bond_uninit()"
Previous message: James Morris: "Re: Config NO_BOOTMEM breaks my amd64 box"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We use the standard generic kernel implementation. Is x86 different? ;)

The optimised fast paths used on x86 rwsems don't disable interrupts.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stephen Hemminger: "Re: [Patch] bonding: fix potential deadlock in bond_uninit()"
Previous message: James Morris: "Re: Config NO_BOOTMEM breaks my amd64 box"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]