Re: start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Thu Apr 01 2010 - 02:31:20 EST
On 03/31/2010 03:26 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Not by adding overhead to every single down_read()/down_write() just to
> fix a once-off startup problem - that's taking laziness way too far.
How much overhead is this on non-x86 architectures (keep in mind x86
doesn't use this?)
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/