Re: RFC: Ideal Adaptive Spinning Conditions
From: Chris Wright
Date: Thu Apr 01 2010 - 13:03:19 EST
* Darren Hart (dvhltc@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Roland Dreier wrote:
>> > I'm looking at some adaptive spinning with futexes as a way to help
>> > reduce the dependence on sched_yield() to implement userspace
>> > spinlocks. Chris, I included you in the CC after reading your comments
>> > regarding sched_yield() at kernel summit and I thought you might be
>> > interested.
>> I think you may have the wrong Chris. Chris Wright wasn't at the most
>> recent kernel summit and I do have a vague recollection of Chris Mason
>> mentioning that Oracle developers found that sched_yield() performed
>> better than futexes + kernel scheduling.
> Oh bother, Sorry Chris! I even talked to Chris Wright about this already
> in person and he told me I probably was looking for Chris Mason, and I
> still got the last names crossed up!
No worries Darren, I happen to be interested in the topic too ;-)
(from KVM point of view, which has a slightly different take)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/