Re: [REGRESSION 2.6.30][PATCH 1/1] sched: defer idle accounting tillafter load update period

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Thu Apr 01 2010 - 16:38:07 EST

On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Chase Douglas wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Also we need to think about a more clever way than just accounting the
> > number of running and uninterruptible tasks. What we really want is to
> > use the numbers which the scheduler has handy, i.e how many tasks did
> > we run since we did the last loadavg calculation. It was always
> > possible (even before the big loadavg changes) to create a task which
> > consumes 50% of a CPU and never shows up in the loadavg calculations
> > at all.
> I'm not sure I follow how knowing how many tasks have been run since
> the last LOAD_FREQ expiration will help, or is that just an example of
> the kind of data the scheduler has available that may be useful?

Yes, it's just an example. Look at the following (UP) scenario:

-> tick calcs loadavg

-> task is woken and runs for 50% of a tick
-> task goes to sleep

-> tick calcs loadavg

So loadavg will say 0 forever, while we in reality know that there was
significant work on that CPU - at least when we have a sched_clock
which has a better granularity than the tick itself.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at