Re: [patch 1/2] genirq: Run irq handlers with interrupts disabled
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Fri Apr 02 2010 - 16:45:33 EST
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2010-03-31 13:16:37, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > Why not simply force IRQF_DISABLED for all MSI interrupts. That still
> > > > allows nesting for non MSI ones, but it limits the chance of throwing
> > > > up reasonably well. That's a two liner.
> > > >
> > > > Can you please test whether it resolves the issue at hand ?
> > >
> > > Sorry for the late answer. Got confirmation that this patch
> > > fixes the test case. Thanks.
> > Ok, I'll push it linus wards and cc stable. I think thats the least
> > intrusive safe bet we can have right now.
> stable? I'd say thats way too intrusive for -stable...
So we better let the possible stack overruns unaddressed ?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/