Re: [PATCH] oprofile: remove double ring buffering
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Sun Apr 04 2010 - 09:08:02 EST
On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 12:01 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Note, I just sent out a patch set yesterday which will conflict with
> > this change.
> > I Cc'd both you and Andi on that patch.
> Steve, is your ring buffer patch intended for stable?
> I plan to submit the oprofile patch for stable and if your is not
> it would be more convenient if your patch was based on mine instead
> of the other way round. If yours is for stable I can rebase on top
> of yours.
No, my patch is not intended for stable, and in fact, is intended for
When yours gets into Linus's tree, we can fix the conflict. It should be
trivial to fix, since the conflict is just me adding another parameter
(NULL) to a function you changed.
I just wanted you to be aware of the change, you don't need to do
anything about it.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/