Re: Downsides to madvise/fadvise(willneed) for application startup
From: Taras Glek
Date: Tue Apr 06 2010 - 18:09:35 EST
On 04/05/2010 04:52 PM, Roland Dreier wrote:
Almost certainly teaching my grandmother to suck eggs, but are you awareYes. There were some stones left unturned in the cold startup area.
Turns out that every single large application suffers from low io
throughput likely due to lack of cooperation between the dynamic linker
and the kernel.
of the work Michael Meeks has done on improving openoffice.org startup time?
There is a glibc bug filed on that.
Unfortunately, few userspace people seem to know exactly how madvise()
hints behave, so I was hoping someone on LKML would clue me in.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/