Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation/development-process: add info onmaintainers

From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Tue Apr 06 2010 - 19:29:49 EST


On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:26:36 -0600 Jonathan Corbet wrote:

> On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:17:05 -0700
> Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > +- Please note that most maintainers also have day jobs, so merging
> > + your patch may not be their highest priority. If your patch is
> > + getting feedback about changes that are needed, you should either
> > + make those changes or justify why they should not be made. If your
> > + patch has no review complaints but is not being merged by its
> > + appropriate subsystem or driver maintainer, you should be persistent
> > + in updating the patch to the current kernel so that it applies cleanly
> > + and keep sending it for review & merging.
>
> I'd prefer to spell out "and" in that last line, being the sort of
> person that I am. Either way:
>
> Acked-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>

OK, I'll change that. Thanks for looking.

---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/