Re: [PATCH 04/16] viafb: Retain GEMODE reserved bits

From: Florian Tobias Schandinat
Date: Thu Apr 08 2010 - 23:07:47 EST


Hi Jon,

Jonathan Corbet schrieb:
Commit c3e25673843153ea75fda79a47cf12f10a25ca37 (viafb: 2D engine rewrite)
changed the setting of the GEMODE register so that the reserved bits are no
longer preserved. Fix that; at the same time, move this code to its own
function and restore the use of symbolic constants.

in your later patch "[PATCH 06/16] viafb: complete support for VX800/VX855 accelerated framebuffer" you reintroduce initializing those bits to 0. That's fine but I can't see a reason for preserving this bits here as it adds useless overhead unless the hardware itself changed some of those bits and behaves differently according to those bits. Additionally the first 2 bits are not reserved but provide a rotation where 00 is what we want (no rotation).
And if you rip code off hw_bitblt_2 it would be better to do the same with hw_bitblt_1. A quick look reveals that the same function can be used there (the error message would need to be adjusted but that's minor).
So nack@preserving (unless it would cause problems otherwise) but ack@ripping code off and sharing between hw_bitblt_1 & hw_bitblt_2.


Thanks,

Florian Tobias Schandinat

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/video/via/accel.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/via/accel.c b/drivers/video/via/accel.c
index d5077df..78c0a2b 100644
--- a/drivers/video/via/accel.c
+++ b/drivers/video/via/accel.c
@@ -165,12 +165,41 @@ static int hw_bitblt_1(void __iomem *engine, u8 op, u32 width, u32 height,
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * Figure out an appropriate bytes-per-pixel setting.
+ */
+static int viafb_set_bpp(void __iomem *engine, u8 bpp)
+{
+ u32 gemode;
+
+ /* Preserve the reserved bits */
+ gemode = readl(engine + VIA_REG_GEMODE) & 0xfffffcff;
+ switch (bpp) {
+ case 8:
+ gemode |= VIA_GEM_8bpp;
+ break;
+ case 16:
+ gemode |= VIA_GEM_16bpp;
+ break;
+ case 32:
+ gemode |= VIA_GEM_32bpp;
+ break;
+ default:
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "hw_bitblt_2: Unsupported bpp %d\n", bpp);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ writel(gemode, engine + VIA_REG_GEMODE);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+
static int hw_bitblt_2(void __iomem *engine, u8 op, u32 width, u32 height,
u8 dst_bpp, u32 dst_addr, u32 dst_pitch, u32 dst_x, u32 dst_y,
u32 *src_mem, u32 src_addr, u32 src_pitch, u32 src_x, u32 src_y,
u32 fg_color, u32 bg_color, u8 fill_rop)
{
u32 ge_cmd = 0, tmp, i;
+ int ret;
if (!op || op > 3) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "hw_bitblt_2: Invalid operation: %d\n", op);
@@ -204,22 +233,9 @@ static int hw_bitblt_2(void __iomem *engine, u8 op, u32 width, u32 height,
}
}
- switch (dst_bpp) {
- case 8:
- tmp = 0x00000000;
- break;
- case 16:
- tmp = 0x00000100;
- break;
- case 32:
- tmp = 0x00000300;
- break;
- default:
- printk(KERN_WARNING "hw_bitblt_2: Unsupported bpp %d\n",
- dst_bpp);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- writel(tmp, engine + 0x04);
+ ret = viafb_set_bpp(engine, dst_bpp);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
if (op == VIA_BITBLT_FILL)
tmp = 0;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/