Re: Poor interactive performance with I/O loads with fsync()ing

From: Avi Kivity
Date: Sun Apr 11 2010 - 11:04:30 EST


On 04/09/2010 05:56 PM, Ben Gamari wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:08:58 +0200, Andi Kleen<andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ben Gamari<bgamari.foss@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
ext4/XFS/JFS/btrfs should be better in this regard

I am using btrfs, so yes, I was expecting things to be better. Unfortunately,
the improvement seems to be non-existent under high IO/fsync load.


btrfs is known to perform poorly under fsync.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/