Re: [PATCH 1/2] AT91 slow-clock suspend: don't wait when turningPLLs off

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 11:27:55PM +0200, Andrew Victor wrote:
> hi Anders,
> 
> > From: Julien Langer <julien.langer@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > AT91: when turning off the PLLs during suspend, don't wait for the lock flag
> > to be set. Previously the code would always run into the loop limitation
> > of 1000 iterations because the flag is never set when turning the PLLs off.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julien Langer <julien.langer@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Anders Larsen <al@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Andrew Victor <avictor.za@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> During suspend we set the MULA and MULB bits to 0 to disable the
> PLL's.  When disabled, the PLLs will never "lock".
> 
>    Acked-by: Andrew Victor <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> Russell:  This is patch 5975/1 in the patch-system.

Thanks; I see your ack has been added to that patch.  Should I assume that
this is for -rc rather than -devel?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/