Re: [PATCH 4/6] change alloc function in vmemmap_alloc_block

From: Mel Gorman
Date: Tue Apr 13 2010 - 12:00:00 EST


On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:25:01AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> if node_state is N_HIGH_MEMORY, node doesn't have -1.

Also, if node_state is called with -1, a negative index is being checked in
a bitmap and that would be pretty broken in itself. I can't see a problem
with this patch.

Reviewed-by: Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx>

> It means node's validity check is unnecessary.
> So we can use alloc_pages_exact_node instead of alloc_pages_node.
> It could avoid comparison and branch as 6484eb3e2a81807722 tried.
>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> index 392b9bb..7710ebc 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ void * __meminit vmemmap_alloc_block(unsigned long size, int node)
> struct page *page;
>
> if (node_state(node, N_HIGH_MEMORY))
> - page = alloc_pages_node(node,
> + page = alloc_pages_exact_node(node,
> GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, get_order(size));
> else
> page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO,
> --
> 1.7.0.5
>

--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/