Re: [PATCH 2/2] ibft: For UEFI machines actually do scan ACPI foriBFT.

[Mike Christie]

On 04/21/2010 04:29 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri,  9 Apr 2010 14:21:28 +0000
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>
> > For machines with IBFT 1.03 do scan the ACPI table for 'iBFT'
> > or for 'IBFT'. If the machine is in UEFI mode, only do the ACPI
> > table scan. For all other machines (pre IBFT 1.03) do
> > a memory scan if not found in the ACPI tables.
> >
> > Author: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The Author: line is unneeded and inappropriate here.  That's what the
> From: line does.
>
> > Acked-by: Peter Jones<pjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Mike Christie<michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Your covering email indicates that Mike and Peter wrote the patches,
> but neither of the patches have their signoffs.  Can we please sort all
> this out?

I did a small fix to 
ibft-update-ibft-handling-for-v103-of-the-spec.patch to get it to 
compile. It looks like that patch has a "Reviewed-by: Mike Christie 
<michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx>". Feel free to change that to a Signed-off-by: 
Mike Christie <michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx> if needed.

I did not do any changes to 
ibft-for-uefi-machines-actually-do-scan-acpi-for-ibft.patch.

I tested both patches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/