Re: [PATCH 0/3] [idled]: Idle Cycle Injector for power capping

[Mike Chan]

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 17:08 -0700, Salman wrote:
>> As we discussed earlier this year, Google has an implementation that it
>> would like to share.  I have finally gotten around to porting it to
>> v2.6.33 and cleaning up the interfaces.  It is provided in the following
>> messages for your review.  I realize that when we first discussed this
>> idea, a lot of ideas were presented for enhancing it.  Thanks alot for
>> your suggestions.  I haven't gotten around to implementing any of them.
>
> .33 is way too old to submit patches against.
>
> That said, I really really dislike this approach, I would much rather
> see it tie in with power aware scheduling.

I may have missed this on lkml but are there any on-going community
efforts to power aware scheduling?

-- Mike

>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/