Re: What's the staging review and acceptance process?

[Randy Dunlap]

John W. Linville wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:42:45AM +0200, Olivier Galibert wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:12:42PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:55:18PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>> Not really, patchwork shows status immediately.
>>> Immediately when someone does something with it, right?  So, the same as
>>> my development cycle?
>> I guess the main difference is that patchwork allows one contributor
>> to see that his patch has just not been checked yet, vs. missed/lost.
> 
> In Greg's defense, I find patchwork to be fairly unwieldy (which is
> why I don't use it).  It is certainly possible that I am missing some
> key feature, but my limited experience with it suggested to me that all
> the clicky-clicky stuff required to deal with the individual messages
> queued in patchwork nearly doubled my time overhead associated with
> merging patches.


Just from a patch submitter perspective, I'd like to see some kind of
response.  I can believe what you say about patchwork, so I wouldn't
advocate it.

I agree to Joe's perspective that Greg is overbooked regarding time.
I think that this is an ongoing problem, not just a current one that
will go away, so for me, the question is what is Greg willing to do
about it?

---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/