Re: platform_bus: Allow runtime PM by default

From: Greg KH
Date: Fri Apr 23 2010 - 11:05:13 EST


On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:57:51AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 04:53:53PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 05:42:50PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Change the default implementation to the standard pm_generic_runtime
> > > one, allowing drivers to use runtime PM without per-architecture
> > > changes.
>
> > That's nice, but it breaks the build on my system:
> > CC drivers/base/platform.o
> > drivers/base/platform.c: In function ???platform_pm_runtime_suspend???:
> > drivers/base/platform.c:970: error: implicit declaration of function ???pm_generic_runtime_suspend???
> > drivers/base/platform.c: In function ???platform_pm_runtime_resume???:
> > drivers/base/platform.c:975: error: implicit declaration of function ???pm_generic_runtime_resume???
> > drivers/base/platform.c: In function ???platform_pm_runtime_idle???:
> > drivers/base/platform.c:980: error: implicit declaration of function ???pm_generic_runtime_idle???
> > make[1]: *** [drivers/base/platform.o] Error 1
> > make: *** [_module_drivers/base] Error 2
>
> > Care to fix it up?
>
> This depends on "PM: Provide generic subsystem-level callbacks" which is
> in Linus' tree - which kernel version are you building against and with
> what config? Things work fine for me in -next...

I was using Linus's latest tree as of yesterday when this failed. Are
you relying on something in -next that is not in Linus's tree?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/