Re: platform_bus: Allow runtime PM by default

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:11:57AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 04:57:21PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Turns out it's commit ad53012 "i2c: Fix bus-level power management
> > callbacks" in the PM tree that it depends on.  Does it make sense to
> > merge this via there rather than via your tree?

> Why would an i2c specific patch be needed here?  Do you have a pointer
> to that patch?

Despite the patch title being I2C specific it actually includes exposing
some of the runtime PM implementation to external users - I2C being the
first user of the generic PM runtime callbacks that I'm trying to use in
the platform device implementation.

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git;a=commitdiff;h=ad530128cd302e5df930b6eb4d4c7e162c40fcb2;hp=b938b00444e900f1c86e754539e3d00f172c184e
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git;a=commitdiff;h=d690b2cd222afc75320b9b8e9da7df02e9e630ca

> And yes, if it depends on something else in the PM tree, feel free to
> send this patch also through it, I have no objection to that.  Rafael,
> care to pick it up?  Mark, you might have to resend it to him.

OK, Raphael please let me know if you need a resend.  Greg, I guess I
can add your Acked-by to that?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/