Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e

[Pekka J Enberg]

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the 
> > > tracking team
> > > know (either way).
> >
> > I have not been able to reproduce it so far.
>
> So what are our options? We can revert the SLUB conversion patch for now but 
> I still can't see what's wrong with it...

I haven't been able to reproduce this either on my Core 2 machine.

Yanmin, does something like this help on your machines? I'm thinking false 
sharing with some other per-CPU data structure that happens to be put in 
same percpu slot as struct kmem_cache_cpu...

			Pekka

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 7d6c8b1..d8159d6 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2066,7 +2066,7 @@ init_kmem_cache_node(struct kmem_cache_node *n, struct kmem_cache *s)
 #endif
 }

-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kmem_cache_cpu, kmalloc_percpu[KMALLOC_CACHES]);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct kmem_cache_cpu, kmalloc_percpu[KMALLOC_CACHES]);

 static inline int alloc_kmem_cache_cpus(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags)
 {
@@ -2077,7 +2077,7 @@ static inline int alloc_kmem_cache_cpus(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags)
 		 */
 		s->cpu_slab = kmalloc_percpu + (s - kmalloc_caches);
 	else
-		s->cpu_slab =  alloc_percpu(struct kmem_cache_cpu);
+		s->cpu_slab = __alloc_percpu(sizeof(struct kmem_cache_cpu), cache_line_size());

 	if (!s->cpu_slab)
 		return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/