Re: [PATCH 10/10] bkl: Fix-up compile problems as a result of the bkl-pushdown.

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Tue Apr 27 2010 - 07:18:37 EST


On Tuesday 27 April 2010, John Kacur wrote:
> Fix-up compile problems as a result of the bkl-pushdown.
> In particular, the v4l2_ioctl should call an unlocked_ioctl
>
> Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/video/v4l2-dev.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/v4l2-dev.c b/drivers/media/video/v4l2-dev.c
> index 3606694..8fbfa61 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/v4l2-dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/v4l2-dev.c
> @@ -222,12 +222,12 @@ static long v4l2_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> struct video_device *vdev = video_devdata(filp);
> int ret;
>
> - if (!vdev->fops->ioctl)
> + if (!vdev->fops->unlocked_ioctl)
> return -ENOTTY;
> /* Allow ioctl to continue even if the device was unregistered.
> Things like dequeueing buffers might still be useful. */
> lock_kernel();
> - ret = vdev->fops->ioctl(filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode, filp, cmd, arg);
> + ret = vdev->fops->unlocked_ioctl(filp, cmd, arg);
> unlock_kernel();
>
> return ret;

No, this is what I thought as well, at first, but the version I posted is
actually correct.

vdev->fops is not struct file_operations but struct v4l2_file_operations,
and the v4l2_ioctl function is used only when fops->ioctl is set, see
__video_register_device.

The v4l2 ioctl stuff probably can use a lot of cleanup itself, but so
far I think we're not making it worse with my patch.

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/