Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm,migration: Remove straggling migration PTEs whenpage tables are being moved after the VMA has already moved

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Date: Tue Apr 27 2010 - 22:54:01 EST


On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:42:27 +0200
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:12:48AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > The page can be replaced with migration_pte before the 1st vma_adjust.
> >
> > The key is
> > (vma, page) <-> address <-> pte <-> page
> > relationship.
> >
> > vma_adjust()
> > (*)
> > move_pagetables();
> > (**)
> > vma_adjust();
> >
> > At (*), vma_address(vma, page) retruns a _new_ address. But pte is not
> > updated. This is ciritcal for rmap_walk. We're safe at (**).
>
> Yes I agree we can move the unlock at (**) because the last vma_adjust
> is only there to truncate the vm_end. In fact it looks super
> heavyweight to call vma_adjust for that instead of just using
> vma->vm_end = new_end considering we're under mmap_sem, full anonymous
> etc... In fact I think even the first vma_adjust looks too
> heavyweight and it doesn't bring any simplicity or added safety
> considering this works in place and there's nothing to wonder about
> vm_next or vma_merge or vm_file or anything that vma_adjust is good at.
>
> So the confusion I had about vm_pgoff is because all things that moves
> vm_start down, also move vm_pgoff down like stack growsdown but of
> course those don't move the pages down too, so we must not alter
> vm_pgoff here just vm_start along with the pagetables inside the
> anon_vma lock to be fully safe. Also I forgot to unlock in case of
> -ENOMEM ;)
>
> this is a new try, next is for a later time... hope this helps!
>
> Thanks!
>
> ----
> Subject: fix race between shift_arg_pages and rmap_walk
>
> From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> migrate.c requires rmap to be able to find all ptes mapping a page at
> all times, otherwise the migration entry can be instantiated, but it
> can't be removed if the second rmap_walk fails to find the page.
>
> So shift_arg_pages must run atomically with respect of rmap_walk, and
> it's enough to run it under the anon_vma lock to make it atomic.
>
> And split_huge_page() will have the same requirements as migrate.c
> already has.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>

Seems good.
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I'll test this and report if I see trouble again.

Unfortunately, I'll have a week of holidays (in Japan) in 4/29-5/05,
my office is nearly closed. So, please consider no-mail-from-me is
good information.


Thanks,
-Kame


> ---
>
> diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
> --- a/fs/exec.c
> +++ b/fs/exec.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
> #include <linux/fsnotify.h>
> #include <linux/fs_struct.h>
> #include <linux/pipe_fs_i.h>
> +#include <linux/rmap.h>
>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
> @@ -502,6 +503,7 @@ static int shift_arg_pages(struct vm_are
> unsigned long length = old_end - old_start;
> unsigned long new_start = old_start - shift;
> unsigned long new_end = old_end - shift;
> + unsigned long moved_length;
> struct mmu_gather *tlb;
>
> BUG_ON(new_start > new_end);
> @@ -514,16 +516,26 @@ static int shift_arg_pages(struct vm_are
> return -EFAULT;
>
> /*
> + * Stop the rmap walk or it won't find the stack pages, we've
> + * to keep the lock hold until all pages are moved to the new
> + * vm_start so their page->index will be always found
> + * consistent with the unchanged vm_pgoff.
> + */
> + spin_lock(&vma->anon_vma->lock);
> +
> + /*
> * cover the whole range: [new_start, old_end)
> */
> - vma_adjust(vma, new_start, old_end, vma->vm_pgoff, NULL);
> + vma->vm_start = new_start;
>
> /*
> * move the page tables downwards, on failure we rely on
> * process cleanup to remove whatever mess we made.
> */
> - if (length != move_page_tables(vma, old_start,
> - vma, new_start, length))
> + moved_length = move_page_tables(vma, old_start,
> + vma, new_start, length);
> + spin_unlock(&vma->anon_vma->lock);
> + if (length != moved_length)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> lru_add_drain();
> @@ -549,7 +561,7 @@ static int shift_arg_pages(struct vm_are
> /*
> * shrink the vma to just the new range.
> */
> - vma_adjust(vma, new_start, new_end, vma->vm_pgoff, NULL);
> + vma->vm_end = new_end;
>
> return 0;
> }
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/