Re: [PATCH 03/10][RFC] tracing: Convert TRACE_EVENT() to use theDECLARE_TRACE_DATA()

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 16:39 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt (rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Switch the TRACE_EVENT() macros to use DECLARE_TRACE_DATA(). This
> > patch is done to prove that the DATA macros work. If any regressions
> > were to surface, then this patch would help a git bisect to localize
> > the area.
> > 
> > Once again this patch increases the size of the kernel.
> > 
> 
> As recommended in the earlier email:
> 
> It would make sense to just add the extra "callback_data" argument
> directly to DECLARE_TRACE(), modify the user (TRACE_EVENT) accordingly.
> And possibly create a TRACE_EVENT_NOARG() variant.

Are you suggesting to make DECLARE_TRACE() be...

#define DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args, data)

?

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/