Re: [PATCH RFC: linux-next 1/2] irq: Add CPU mask affinity hintcallback framework

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Fri Apr 30 2010 - 14:53:40 EST


On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Peter P Waskiewicz Jr wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 12:48 -0700, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Thinking more about it, I wonder whether you have a cpu_mask in your
> > driver/device private data anyway. I bet you have :)
>
> Well, at this point we don't, but nothing says we can't.

Somewhere you need to store that information in your driver, right ?

> > So it should be sufficient to set a pointer to that cpu_mask in
> > irq_desc and get rid of the callback completely.
>
> So "register" would just assign the pointer, and "unregister" would make
> sure to NULL the mask pointer out. I like it. It'll sure clean things
> up too.

Yep, that'd be like the set_irq_chip() function. Just assign the
pointer under desc->lock.

Thanks,

tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/