Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: eliminate TS_XSAVE

[Avi Kivity]

On 05/04/2010 12:45 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > I was trying to avoid a performance regression relative to the current
> > code, as it appears that some care was taken to avoid the memory reference.
> >
> > I agree that it's probably negligible compared to the save/restore
> > code.  If the x86 maintainers agree as well, I'll replace it with
> > cpu_has_xsave.
> >
> >      
> I asked Suresh to comment on this, since he wrote the original code.  He
> did confirm that the intent was to avoid a global memory reference.
>
>    

Ok, so you're happy with the patch as is?

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/