Re: [PATCH 01/12] sched: drop @cpu argument from sched_in preemptnotifier

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue May 04 2010 - 13:11:47 EST

Next message: Alan Stern: "Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/8] PM: Add suspend block api."
Previous message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH 04/12] perf: add @rq to perf_event_task_sched_out()"
In reply to: Tejun Heo: "[PATCH 01/12] sched: drop @cpu argument from sched_in preempt notifier"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [RFC PATCHSET] sched,perf: unify tracers in sched and moveperf on top of TP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 14:38 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> @cpu parameter is superflous. Drop it. This will help unifying
> notifiers in sched.

This seems sensible enough.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Stern: "Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/8] PM: Add suspend block api."
Previous message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH 04/12] perf: add @rq to perf_event_task_sched_out()"
In reply to: Tejun Heo: "[PATCH 01/12] sched: drop @cpu argument from sched_in preempt notifier"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [RFC PATCHSET] sched,perf: unify tracers in sched and moveperf on top of TP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]