Re: rwsem: down_read_unfair() proposal

[David Howells]

Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I only said it was doable :) Not done with the implementation yet, but I can
> describe the general idea if that helps. The high part of the rwsem is
> decremented by two for each thread holding or trying to acquire a write
> lock;

That would mean you're reducing the capacity of the upper counter by one since
the high part must remain negative if we're to be able to check it for
non-zeroness by checking the sign flag.  That means a maximum of 2^14-1 writers
queued on a 32-bit box (16384), but we can have more threads than that (up to
~32767).

Currently, we can have a maximum of 32767 writers+readers queued as we only
decrement the upper counter by 1 each time.

On a 64-bit box, the limitations go away for all practical purposes.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/