Re: [PATCHv1 2.6.34-rc6 1/3] mxc: gadget: remove 60mhz clock requirement for freescale mx51 usb core

From: Fabio Estevam
Date: Thu May 06 2010 - 14:40:00 EST




--- On Wed, 5/5/10, Dinh Nguyen <Dinh.Nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Dinh Nguyen <Dinh.Nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCHv1 2.6.34-rc6 1/3] mxc: gadget: remove 60mhz clock requirement for freescale mx51 usb core
> To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Dinh Nguyen" <Dinh.Nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jun.Li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, daniel@xxxxxxxx, bryan.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xiao-lizhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, valentin.longchamp@xxxxxxx
> Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 7:56 PM
> for mx51, usb core is clocked from
> sources that are not 60mhz.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <Dinh.Nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_mx3_udc.c |   14
> ++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_mx3_udc.c
> b/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_mx3_udc.c
> index 20a802e..d0b8bde 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_mx3_udc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_mx3_udc.c

Shouldn't this file be renamed to fsl_mx_udc.c ?

fsl_mx3_udc.c suggests that it applies for MX31/MX35 processors.

Regards,

Fabio Estevam



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/