Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the suspend tree

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Fri May 07 2010 - 22:13:16 EST


On Friday 07 May 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> After merging the suspend tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> net/mac80211/scan.c: In function 'ieee80211_scan_state_decision':
> net/mac80211/scan.c:510: error: implicit declaration of function 'pm_qos_requirement'
>
> Caused by commit 62bad14fc6e0911a99882c261390968977d43283 ("PM QOS
> update") from the suspend tree interacting with commit
> df13cce53a7b28a81460e6bfc4857e9df4956141 ("mac80211: Improve software
> scan timing") from the net tree.
>
> I have added the following merge fixup patch and can carry it as
> necessary:

Thanks a lot, please do so if that's not a problem.

Both trees are based on Linus' current and I don't see a good way of fixing
this issue in any of them individually.

Rafael


> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 13:02:54 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] wireless: update for pm_qos_requirement to pm_qos_request rename
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/mac80211/scan.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/scan.c b/net/mac80211/scan.c
> index e14c441..e1b0be7 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/scan.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/scan.c
> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static int ieee80211_scan_state_decision(struct ieee80211_local *local,
> bad_latency = time_after(jiffies +
> ieee80211_scan_get_channel_time(next_chan),
> local->leave_oper_channel_time +
> - usecs_to_jiffies(pm_qos_requirement(PM_QOS_NETWORK_LATENCY)));
> + usecs_to_jiffies(pm_qos_request(PM_QOS_NETWORK_LATENCY)));
>
> listen_int_exceeded = time_after(jiffies +
> ieee80211_scan_get_channel_time(next_chan),
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/